Parameter interpretation: It can be seen that the difference between Ryzen 3 1300X and 1200 is only the frequency. The former frequency is 0.4 GHz higher than the latter, and the theoretical actual performance difference is about 10%. Compared with the older brother Ryzen 5 1400, it is a worse SMT hyper-threading technology (that is, a core simulation into 2 thread technology, Intel's called HT, AMD called SMT), but the frequency is a little higher than his brother.

New price: Here you may see Ryzen 3 1300X pricing guilty, as long as the increase of 110 yuan, you can buy more than 4 threads of Ryzen 5 1400, after all, Ryzen 5 has been listed for some time, also experienced two Three times the price, so it will lead to a small price gap between the two, it is estimated that after a few months of Ryzen 3 listing, there will be a certain degree of price reduction.

On the nuclear display: Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 positioning the product does not deserve nuclear is nothing wrong, after all, users choose this level of products, not a professional crowd, is an enthusiast or local tyrants are not short of money, usually equipped with graphics. However, more than 700 dollars is obviously the Core i3-level CPU, the consumers will be close to the crowd, many of these users are not equipped with significant independence, such as office machines, light Internet users Wait, then we can't ignore the role of nuclear at this time, but Ryzen 3 has not been verified...

Rui Long 3 Open Box with Wraith Stealth Radiator:

Like most CPUs, the CPU body is exposed on one side of the box.

Rzyzen 3

Box equipment

Stealth Radiator

The bottom of the factory has been coated with grease

Stealth Radiator

Do not look at Ryzen 3's box looked oversized, in fact, the radiator was removed and looked quite compact, but anyway, that is 65W products, such a radiator is properly adequate. Moreover, the performance of AMD's Ghost Series radiators has also been tested before. Due to the new bearing technology, the noise can be controlled very well even at high rotational speeds.

Theoretical performance test:

This evaluation mainly from the CPU theoretical performance, game performance, power consumption, temperature comparison, overclocking five aspects, in the CPU performance evaluation, we added a variety of competing products CPU as a comparison. CPU game performance test with RX 580 graphics card to ensure that the graphics card does not become a CPU bottleneck.

The graphics card selected AMD's own RX 580, after all, the Ryzen 3 positioning CPU will not generally be equipped with GTX1080 or even more graphics cards, while the AMD side has already listed the gaming graphics card is the most advanced RX 580, so the election.

● CPU theoretical performance test

Fritz Chess Benchmark is a computer chess force test program that comes with chess software. Because it supports CPU multithreading, and it does a lot of scientific calculations, it is often used to test the scientific computing capabilities of computers. It uses the algorithm of AI to think about chess's algorithm. To test the computer's ability to run chess, the higher the score, the stronger the performance.

wPrime is a software (especially a parallel capability) that tests the computing power of computers by the number of primes, and the shorter the time, the better the computing performance.

CPU-Z is a well-known CPU detection software. It is a software that detects the highest CPU usage. The supported CPU types are quite comprehensive, and the software's startup speed and detection speed are very fast. In addition, its new Benchmark can effectively test the single-core and multi-core CPU performance. The higher the score, the better the performance!

● 3DMark physical operation test

● Common software performance testing

WinRAR is a powerful compressed package manager, which uses its equal size file for compression time testing, which can effectively detect the performance of the CPU. The less time, the better the performance.

● Professional software performance test

TMPGEnc is a set of old high-quality video code conversion tools developed by Japanese companies. Expert group with more than 15 years of video conversion and editing software experience. The ability to perform format conversion and encoding software on its peer-to-peer capacity video files can effectively test CPU performance. The less time spent, the better the performance!

Using Adobe Premiere Pro to transcode and export the same video file can effectively test the CPU's encoding capabilities, and the less time it takes, the better the performance.

CineBench is a persuasive set of CPU and graphics test systems, the latest is the R15 version can support up to 256 logic cores, but also enhanced the shader, anti-aliasing, shadows, lights and reflection blur, etc., for CPU performance The detection is more accurate, the higher the score, the stronger the performance!

Test summary: CPU theory runs on points, the performance of Ryzen 3 1300X in many theoretical projects has been very close to the i5-7500, but in some old software applications and i5 there is some gap. The gap with their own brother Ryzen 5 1400 is not as big as the difference between 4 threads and 8 threads, which has a lot to do with the high frequency of 1300X.

●CPU game performance test

Test summary: All games in the game test were run at a resolution of 2K. The number of frames of the 4 games is very close. The game with a little difference is the watch pioneer. The Ryzen 5 1400 performance is better than 1300, but other The performance of the game, three CPUs almost no difference, you can play I can play, I can not play you do not want to play ... almost that is the relationship.

● Platform power consumption comparison test

Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 have the same power consumption during standby, and i5 is actually several watts, which is negligible for desktop computers.

With the CPU fully loaded, you can see that the power consumption of the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 is almost the same, i5 is slightly higher, but in fact it is also a 7-watt gap, which is also negligible.

The full load test of the game is to allow all of the host's hardware to be fully loaded at the same time. At this time, the power consumption gap between i5 and Ryzen 3 is expanded to 12 watts, which is still negligible.

In other words, the power consumption of the three CPUs is at the same level, but due to the higher frequency of the Ryzen 3 1300X, the 4-core 4-thread Ryzen 3 1300X consumes slightly more power than the 4-core 8-thread Ryzen 5 1400. It's worse than both of them.

● Comparison of CPU full load temperature

The radiators used are all AMD boxed models. For these 65W CPUs, they are sufficient.

It can be seen that the heat output is also higher for Ryzen 3 than for Ryzen 5, and it is related to its higher frequency. After all, they are actually the same core, but they only turn off the SMT hyper-threading function and can still use this small heat sink. Keeping the temperature at 58°C, the CPU's heat control is still very good. If there are any later pieces, buying an ordinary Red Sea is enough.

PConline evaluation room summary:

Take the average of all the above tests and calculate the overall performance percentage of the three CPUs. The i5-7500 is only about 9% of the Ryzen 3 1300X.

PConline ladder diagram:

The performance is slightly weaker than the Intel Core i5-7500. The performance of the two is relatively close, so it is in this position of the ladder diagram.